Indicators on case law on bail on new facts You Should Know
Indicators on case law on bail on new facts You Should Know
Blog Article
Since the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become reached, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) in the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by regulation." It truly is nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the figured out counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession of the subjected premises for the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to become decided from the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this aspect for interim custody of the topic premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
Sign up for E-mail Notification of recent opinions The cases listed underneath have had opinions filed for them within the last 14 times. The following information is accessible for each case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, which includes signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. Additionally they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi models, with non-compliance struggling with departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They can be directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. twelve. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more
one hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were explained to in the boy’s past, they asked if their children were Protected with him in their home. The therapist certain them that they had absolutely nothing to fret about.
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this can be a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents of your boy or Woman don't approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they could do if they are able to Slash off social relations with the son or the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, website if any boy or Female who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that's a major, the couple is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who offers such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings from the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by legislation.
The DCFS social worker in charge of your boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, As well as in her 6-month report to the court, the worker elaborated around the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
Article 199 from the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by legislation." It is properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative on the law laid down from the Supreme Court from the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Hence, the competent authority in the parent department of the petitioner plus the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount of the petitioner and shell out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits on the petitioner to which he is entitled under the law within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority from the respondent is additionally directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits in the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
Any court may possibly seek to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to achieve a different summary. The validity of such a distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to a higher court.
seventeen . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have listened to the uncovered counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession from the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided from the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer within the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this part for interim custody of the subject premises Should the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
States also normally have courts that cope with only a specific subset of legal matters, which include family law and probate. Case law, also known as precedent or common law, will be the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending about the relationship between the deciding court along with the precedent, case legislation could possibly be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision because of the U.S. Court of Appeals for that Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting down in California (whether a federal or state court) will not be strictly bound to Adhere to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by a person district court in The big apple will not be binding on another district court, but the first court’s reasoning could help guide the second court in achieving its decision. Decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more